Shimla: The tourism village project in Himachal Pradesh has ignited protests, leading to a significant political clash. The controversy centers around the government’s decision to transfer 112 hectares of land from the Agricultural University, Palampur, to create a tourism village. This decision was made public without a cabinet meeting. Now it has triggered outrage among students, faculty, and local residents.
On Tuesday, a delegation from the Agricultural University, Palampur, accompanied by representatives from the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), met with Governor Shri Shiv Pratap Shukla at Raj Bhavan, Shimla. They submitted a memorandum opposing the land transfer, arguing that it compromises essential agricultural research and education.
Government Decision Under Fire
Abhay Verma, President of the ABVP’s Agricultural University unit, expressed strong objections to the project. “While we support the vision to make Kangra the tourism capital, taking away 112 hectares from our university for a tourism village is misguided,” Verma said.
He highlighted that the land in question is crucial for research in natural farming, livestock production, and other agricultural activities. This land supports essential facilities, including natural farms, dairy farms, and seed storage, which are integral to the university’s mission.
Educational Impact and Student Concerns
Nitika Thakur, State Convenor of Agrivision, emphasized the growing need for space due to increasing student enrollment and the implementation of the New Education Policy. With limited hostel facilities, many students, especially women, are forced to live off-campus. The university also plans to establish an Agricultural Engineering College, making the retention of current land vital for future expansion.
Gokul Lakhanara, State Co-convener of Agrivision, vowed to continue the protests until the government retracts its decision. “No government representative will be allowed on campus until this issue is resolved,” Lakhanara said.
Public Sentiment and Government Response
The decision has fueled allegations that the project is a ploy to transfer state assets to political allies. Despite these accusations, thos sitting in power have denied any wrongdoing. The escalating tension underscores the need for a transparent dialogue and reconsideration of the project’s impact on the university’s educational and research capabilities.
