Munish Sood
Mandi
The controversy over alleged remarks by Himachal Pradesh Cabinet Minister Jagat Singh Negi on the appearance, attire and makeup of Mandi MP Kangana Ranaut has taken a political turn, with Prof Anupama Singh questioning the language being used against an elected woman representative and calling for greater dignity in public discourse.
Reacting to the controversy, Singh said political leaders were free to criticise an opponent’s policies, performance and political decisions, but comments directed at a woman’s appearance or personal choices had no place in a healthy democratic debate.
She said Kangana Ranaut, irrespective of political differences, was an elected representative and should be judged on her performance as an MP rather than her clothes, makeup or appearance.
“Political differences are natural in a democracy, but personal remarks about a woman’s appearance cross the line of political decency,” Singh said.
Taking aim at the Congress government, she alleged that when questions relating to development and public welfare became difficult to answer, some of its leaders resorted to personal attacks. She said the focus of political debate should instead remain on issues directly affecting the people of Himachal Pradesh.
Singh also linked the controversy to the Congress government’s commitments to women during the Assembly elections. Referring to the promised ₹1,500 monthly assistance for eligible women, she alleged that women were encouraged to submit forms during the election campaign but were still waiting for the fulfilment of the promise.
She questioned whether women should be remembered only during elections and their concerns overlooked once the votes had been cast.
“Women are not merely a vote bank. They deserve dignity, accountability and delivery on promises,” Singh said.
She further urged the government to shift the political discourse towards substantive issues, including employment, inflation, roads, education, development and commitments made to women.
According to Singh, the controversy should serve as a reminder that political criticism must focus on public performance rather than personal attributes.
“The people want answers on governance and delivery. They want to know what has been done on the ground—not hear personal taunts and political jibes,” she said.
Singh maintained that differences of opinion were an essential part of democracy, but those differences should never become an excuse for crossing the boundaries of personal dignity. She said the women of Himachal Pradesh were increasingly aware of their rights and responsibilities and would ultimately judge political parties by their conduct, performance and commitment to their promises.
