Major controversy over abolition of vacant posts in Himachal, CM Sukhu clarifies stance, Vikramaditya takes a different view
- Pre Paragliding World Cup Kicks Off in Bir Billing Valley, 105 Pilots from 32 Countries Competing - November 2, 2024
- Diwali business: HRTC earns record revenue - November 2, 2024
- Interest-Free Aid from Center Boosts Chandigarh-Baddi Rail Line Project - November 2, 2024
Shimla: A significant political storm has erupted in Himachal Pradesh following the Finance Department’s notification to eliminate posts that have been vacant for over two years in various departments and public sector undertakings. Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu, addressing the media on Saturday, clarified the government’s stance on the issue, responding to mounting criticism on social media over the decision.
In his clarification, CM Sukhu said, “Departments were questioned on why certain posts have not been filled over the last 20 years. The response revealed that many of these positions are no longer relevant. These posts are being converted, not abolished, based on current needs.
Similar letters have been issued by previous governments as well.” He assured that the exercise aims to optimize resources and align department roles with modern-day requirements.
Also Read: https://thenewzradar.com/jai-ram-slams-himachal-cm-over-backdated-job-notification-says-reflects-decline-in-governance/
The Chief Minister emphasised that budgets are allocated even for unfilled posts. “We have requested detailed information on positions that are redundant and suggestions on relevant replacements.
This information will help us reallocate resources effectively in the upcoming budget. However, this crucial aspect of our plan was ignored on social media,” he stated, pointing out that essential posts would be created in place of outdated ones.
Some of the longstanding vacant posts include roles like typists, which, CM Sukhu explained, are being converted to more relevant roles such as clerks or Junior Office Assistants (IT). He added, “These are routine procedures and were also conducted during previous BJP administrations.”
However, a differing perspective emerged from Public Works Minister Vikramaditya Singh, who took to social media to share his take on the matter. While he defended the government’s approach, his posts suggested some nuanced differences in opinion regarding the execution and communication of the policy.
The debate highlights contrasting views within the government over administrative reforms, with the Chief Minister urging the public to understand the broader intent behind the reorganisation of resources.
Meanwhile, Vikramaditya’s response reflects the need for a more nuanced dialogue on how these decisions impact public perception and the operational efficacy of government departments.
